Wan 3.0 against the five models it loses briefs to

Every cell is a row from the article it links to, and every article cites the vendor document the row came from. Where a rival wins, the article says which brief to take there. Read 2026-08-26.

Wan 3.0 compared with Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.5, MiniMax H3 and Wan 2.7 on each vendor’s published parameter table
Specification	Wan 3.0	Google Veo 3.1	Kling 3.0	Seedance 2.5	MiniMax H3	Wan 2.7	Wan 2.5
Duration	2–30 s, any integer	4, 6 or 8 s — 8 only above 720p	3–15 s	4–30 s	4–15 s	2–15 s, or 2–10 s with a reference video	5 s or 10 s — nothing in between
Frame rate	30 fps	24 fps	Not published	Not published	24 fps	30 fps	Not published
Resolutions	480P / 720P / 1080P	720p / 1080p / 4K	720p / 1080p	480p / 720p — no 4K, despite the announcement	768P / 2K	720P / 1080P	480P / 720P / 1080P
Aspect ratios	adaptive, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16	16:9, 9:16	16:9, 9:16, 1:1	adaptive, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, 21:9	21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16	adaptive, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16	No ratio setting — a width×height size, 3 shapes at 480P, 5 above
Reference inputs	10 images + 5 videos + 5 audio	Up to 3 asset images	Start frame plus element reference	30 images + 10 videos + 10 audio	9 images + 3 videos + 3 audio	Reference images and video, on one of four endpoints	First frame only — no reference family
Document or URL input	Yes — 12 formats, ≤50 pages, or one URL	No	No	No	No	No	No
Edit an existing clip	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	Yes, on a separate endpoint	No
Native audio	Same price on or off	Included	+50% per second	Included	Included	Included	Included
Open weights	No	No	No	No	Yes	No	No